Pricing gets blamed first, but it often hides deeper issues in positioning, value, or speed.
A few key accounts go quiet. A competitor wins unexpectedly. Sales flag pricing pressure. Almost immediately, pricing changes are underway.
When revenue drops, pricing is the first thing blamed. If margins shrink, it's the first lever leadership pulls. And when market share slips, someone inevitably calls for "more competitive pricing," rarely asking if price was ever the real issue.
Yet performance still doesn't improve. Price wasn't the problem. It was just the symptom. The real breakdowns driving the pressure get ignored, while leadership adjusts the one lever that feels controllable.
You don't have a pricing problem. You have a positioning gap showing up in your numbers.
Here's how this usually plays out:
To test if pricing is the real issue, ask:
1. If we matched the competitor's price, would we win?
2. Is this segment growing or shrinking in profitability?
3. Would solving this customer's problem justify a premium?
Take the distributor convinced they were losing on price. Quote-to-close rates had dropped 30%, and discounting wasn't helping.
The real issue? Their competitor launched a self-service configurator that let engineers spec their BOM in five minutes. They were still sending quotes days later.
It wasn't about price. It was speed and convenience. They weren't losing at the end. They were losing before the deal began.
That's the trap. If you're not asking harder questions about value and competitive position, you're discounting your way around a deeper issue.
You don't regain margin by being cheaper. You regain it by being worth more.